Request Demo
Request Demo
See Brandwatch live in action and discover how it can give your business the edge.
Call us on:
+44 (0)1273 234 290Mailing list sign-up
Categories
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- May 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
Alias v Tracking Systems
June 12th, 2008. Posted by Phil NewmanSo I decided to compare data between the iphone and Nokia 95, two phones which I suspected shared common air in the blogosphere. The N95,…ah!
Something that Brandwatch brings to light is the hold a particular brand name has over a brand tracking system. There were 2284 mentions for ‘iphone’ last week, and 180 for ‘Nokia 95′. Really? So few for the new Nokia? To what extent are these volume results manipulated by the brand tracking friendliness of these respective brand names?
It’s reasonable to say that iphone is the iphone is the iphone – at least from the point of view of the tracker – and this is all that matters here. But the ‘Nokia 95′ is also the ‘N95′. And here lies the difficulty when fixing tracking parameters: the relationship between the phone itself and the name it is being tracked under is compromised. The new Nokia phone more commonly goes under the name of ‘N95′.
The tracking system has revealed its own worst enemy to us: aliases. They fragment the aim of the tracker to such an extent that unless vigilance is maintained, results only tell part of any story – even though this may look like the whole one.
So I guess what I’m saying is that the tracking system sometimes needs to be tracked too. Otherwise any data associated with any brand will be limited in value before the word go. Get the names right, and the brand will follow, to paraphrase violently Kevin Costner’s friend in ‘The field of dreams’.
In order to ensure that all relevant mentions out there for a brand are gathered together for analysis, first of all we must gather all the names. I guess this was very quickly labelled the ‘Orange’ problem: ‘Orange’ on its own gets you nowhere because it takes you everywhere. The tracker has to be configured with care before any results are straight and true enough to be analysed with care.
Of course, the User Interface of the system will know and tell you nothing of this back story, except it does. These numbers I found were suspicious. So, of course, we now include ‘N95′, and with this, add the relevant exclusion terms that this alias requires. Of course things are made more beguiling when we are talking about the world of blogs and forums, where a brand carries the most of aliases of all.