Request Demo
Request Demo
See Brandwatch live in action and discover how it can give your business the edge.
Call us on:
+44 (0)1273 234 290Mailing list sign-up
Categories
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- May 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
How Good Is Good Enough?
June 19th, 2008. Posted by Giles PalmerSeth Godin wrote a moving post yesterday about worthiness. He writes almost as a stream of consciousness and makes some great points.
I like the last one best
“The object isn’t to be perfect. The goal isn’t to hold back until you’ve created something beyond reproach. I believe the opposite is true. Our birthright is to fail and to fail often, but to fail in search of something bigger than we can imagine. To do anything else is to waste it all.”
Which leads to the question how good is good enough. How quickly should you release. In particular, this applies nicely to software. How many bugs are acceptable before making a release? Or what level of bug is acceptable to let through?
These are tough questions. I am often told that software companies don’t get their stuff ‘out there’ quickly enough. They wait too long and miss the moment. But then I think of something like the iphone which entered a crowded market years after the first guys launched and have now sold more than 6 million phones. Or Google which came late and killed the incumbents. These examples point to quality being the most important factor not timeliness. But in reality it has to be both. The longer you leave it, the better you have to be in order to be good enough to make an impact. iPhone was just very very good, as was Google.