What is Looksmaxxing? Why Brands Need to Tread Carefully

Right now, there’s a corner of the internet treating self-improvement like a competition. 

They’re measuring their jawlines. They’re debating “canthal tilt.” And they’re documenting skincare routines with near-clinical precision.

It's called looksmaxxing.

But it isn’t just another TikTok micro-trend. It’s a long-standing conversation about masculinity, status, and self-worth – and right now, it's spreading.

So, what does the rise in looksmaxxing mean for brands? And why is this such sensitive territory? Let’s take a closer look. 

What is looksmaxxing?

Looksmaxxing refers to the practice of maximizing your physical attractiveness to improve perceived social and romantic success. It’s gained some serious traction in online communities, particularly among young men. 

According to Brandwatch Consumer Research, the looksmaxxing conversation generated 806k online mentions between September 2025 and February 2026 – a 20% increase from the previous six months.

But perhaps more telling: 405k unique authors got involved with the conversation – a 32% jump. That rise in participation suggests this isn’t just an existing community becoming louder. It’s expanding. 

The new year marked a major tipping point. Weekly mentions hovered around 20k through fall before surging dramatically in late December and again in February.

In fact, conversations exceeded 70k mentions in a single week last month. And despite mention volume possibly stabilizing towards the end of February, chatter still sat at over 40k weekly mentions.

The content spans everything from "face audits” and cosmetic procedure recommendations to extreme techniques that claim to alter bone structure. There’s also softmaxxing – a more accessible version focused on achievable improvements like clearing up acne or getting a better gym routine. 

Looksmaxxing itself isn’t new. It originated on forums back in the early 2010s. But what was once a niche, insular topic has since entered more mainstream digital spaces – particularly through short-form video platforms. Influencers documenting dramatic transformations have accelerated its visibility, too.

After all, the more striking the glow-up, the more engagement it tends to generate.

The dark side of the trend

Looksmaxxing is no stranger to criticism. In fact, 84% of sentiment-categorized mentions about the topic are negative.

Backlash centres around body dysmorphia, steroid use, the normalisation of cosmetic surgery, and the psychological impact of ranking attractiveness. And at the heart of the criticism is growing concern about men’s mental health.  

Language from these communities has also moved into broader internet culture. Terms like “mogging” – used to describe being significantly more attractive than someone else – have surged alongside the wider trend, with mentions of “mogging” increasing 135% from January to February. 

The vocabulary reinforces hierarchy among looksmaxxers. It frames self-improvement not as personal growth, but as a competition.  

For some, looksmaxxing feels empowering – it’s a structured way to take control. As Jamilla Rosdahl from the Australian College of Applied Psychology wrote: “Where young people feel like they can’t control their environment, they may turn to trends such as looksmaxxing as something they can control.”  

But on the flip side, the movement is also rooted in insecurity and, in some spaces, isolation. And as participation grows, so does concern from mental health advocates.  

After all, this isn’t just a beauty trend, it’s a wellbeing conversation. And that’s what makes it sensitive territory for brands. 

How can brands tread lightly?

A 32% increase in unique authors shows us that new participants are entering the looksmaxxing conversation – not just observing it. Young men are talking openly about skincare. They’re comparing cosmetic procedures. And they’re publicly tracking progress.   

But this visibility does not equal endorsement.  

While the growth of the looksmaxxing conversation reflects shifting norms around male grooming and self-presentation, brands need to resist the temptation to lean into the more extreme or competitive elements driving engagement. Popularity alone isn’t a green light.  

Looksmaxxing communities often speak in metrics – like jawline angles and percentages of muscle mass – and they tend to value proof and transparency. Educational, research-based messaging may resonate more than aspirational aesthetics alone, but this is where brands must be nuanced. It’s important to ensure that performance-driven messaging avoids implying deficiency. There’s a fine line between “enhance what you have” and “fix what’s wrong.”   

A grooming brand using looksmaxxing vocabulary might generate short-term engagement, but given that 84% of sentiment is negative, that association carries real reputational risk – whereas a brand that leads with 'build a routine that works for you' frames the product as a tool for self-care rather than a correction for a flaw.  

Brands need to critically analyze their own messaging. They need to ask if they’re encouraging healthy self-improvement, or reinforcing comparison culture.   

After all, in a social space where algorithms dominate and validation feels measurable, brands can decide to fuel the pressure – or help to reshape it. 

Want this content directly in your inbox?

We share monthly insights into the latest trends via email on the Brandwatch Bulletin. Why not subscribe to get the action straight to your inbox?